I came across an article this weekend about a recent study done at Northwestern, one of my alma maters, that suggests “Leadership remains a man’s world.”
The leadership study examined the extent to which stereotypes of leaders are culturally masculine. It concluded that, “All 3 paradigms demonstrated overall masculinity of leader stereotypes.” Now, it did go on to say, “Subgroup and meta-regression analyses indicated that this masculine construal of leadership has decreased over time,” which is good news, but here are a few things that concerned me:
1. The study abstract said that men, more than women, had this masculine construal of leadership.
2. The article itself stated that, “women who engage in behavior necessary for positions of power, are usually seen as inappropriate and presumptuous.”
While it’s obvious in both cases that neither statement is positive news for women, I don’t think either is good news for men either. Here’s why:
1. The Pew Paradox for Men
A Pew Research Center Study entitled, “Men or Women: Who’s the Better Leader?” that was brought to my attention by Dale Lawrence via a discussion we had on Google+, showed that when 2250 adults were surveyed about the traits most important to leadership, in five out of the top eight traits (honest, intelligent, compassionate, outgoing, creative) women were rated higher than men by substantial margins. Only in “decisiveness” did men score higher than women, and we tied at “hard-working” and “ambitious.”
So, while studies are clearly showing that leadership traits are not genuinely perceived to be more masculine than feminine, men still hold fast to this stereotype according to the Northwestern study.
Furthermore, insight from the Pew Study respondents suggests that the public believes what’s holding women back even though they have “what it takes” to be top leaders includes:
- gender discrimination
- resistance to change
- a “self-serving” old boys club
Could the fact that men still hold fast to the cultural stereotype of leadership as culturally masculine be contributing to the discrimination and the resistance to change given that they’re the ones “at the top” making key talent management decisions? Is fear at the core of this in any way?
Either way, I think this hurts men in the long run.
If the public truly believes women are being purposefully held back by men, as the Pew study goes on to assert specifically in regard to elective office, then male leaders are destined to be viewed less favorably over time – often unfairly.
And organizations that need the important attributes women bring to the table, but who are resistant to change and don’t hire women leaders, will not be as successful as they could be. This hurts men as well as the entire organization, in particular the men who are mentoring and supporting women leaders but who may not be the top decision makers at the company.
2. Squelching our true selves hurts men too
I’ll be very honest. The sentence that read, “women who engage in behavior necessary for positions of power, are usually seen as inappropriate and presumptuous,” was incredibly disheartening. As the Pew study clearly showed, women are exemplary at behavior necessary for leadership positions. So why are we seen as inappropriate and presumptuous, and who determines what’s considered “behavior necessary for positions of power?”
More importantly for this post, what does this mean for men? If cultural stereotypes are dictating how women should behave, do men feel they must behave a certain way too? What if it’s not in their true nature to fill a prescribed, stereotypical mold? Are they able to bring their true selves to their leadership roles?
The Abraham Lincoln Empathy Example
My friend Margie Clayman reminded me of the example Abraham Lincoln set in regard to empathy, which is typically considered a feminine trait.
In February of 1862 Lincoln was distraught at the death of his son Willie. In the months that followed, according to Donald T. Phillips’s “Lincoln on Leadership,” he traveled outside of the White House upwards of 18 days a month visiting the troops and families who had lost loved ones in the war. He was able to empathize with their loss and use his own personal emotions to fuel his connection with his “team” – the Union soldiers.
Phillips goes on to say:
Arriving in Washington aboard the River Queen in the evening hours of April 9, 1865, Lincoln was one of the last people in Washington to hear of Lee’s surrender to Grant at Appomattox. Typical of the man, the first thing Lincoln did upon his arrival was to head straight to William Seward’s residence. He had to visit his friend, the secretary of state, who, while Lincoln was gone, had suffered an accident and was bedridden.
I would like to think that Lincoln’s example of empathy and emotional connectivity is one that all men can follow rather than to be intimidated by cultural stereotypes. Unfortunately, I suspect this may not be the case.
A toast to a transformed future…
So, here’s to the day when men and women alike feel confident enough to bring our unabashed true selves to the table in our leadership roles. And here’s to the day when leaders choose to balance their teams based on individual strengths, valued talents and uniquely brilliant qualities – seeing and valuing all of these in women in the same way they should be seen and valued in men.
What do you think?
Let’s talk about it tomorrow night at #LeadershipChat – which is Open Mic this week! Any leadership topic or challenge is up for discussion!
~
If you enjoyed this post please share it with others using the share links below and please subscribe to my blog! Here’s how:
- Subscribe Here to have my blog posts easily delivered to your email in-box the morning they are published.
- To receive posts via “READER” Subscribe Here.
To hire me for Visionary Leadership programs, and to work with me, email me at Lisa@CLevelStrategies.com.
Thank you for reading and for being part of this community – it means so much to me.
You can find me on Twitter at @LisaPetrilli, on Google+ at www.gplus.to/lispetrilli and on LinkedIn. Please let me know you’re a reader when we connect!
RELATED POSTS:
When it Comes to Leadership, Women Rule
Leaders Open Up on Who Leads Better, Men or Women
Photo is Brigadier General Gouverneur Kemble Warren at Gettysburg by Soaptree.
10 Response Comments
this is such a fantastic post, Lisa. I think it gets right down to the crux of why some people can’t see women as true leaders (because let’s face it, a woman who tries to emulate men is berated for being emotion-less and for wearing pant suits).
Great, fantastic, and important post.
Thank you for the mention as well as for the reminder that I really need to read that book!!
Thanks, Margie! And thank you for the great reminder of that Lincoln example. I know I didn’t use it the way you were envisioning…but it just seemed to solidify the point. Thanks again for all your support!
Thank you, Mack – I appreciate that. I think you’re right – and it’s so unfortunate because we are all a balance of masculine and feminine. How we balance and choose to express ourselves should never be judged, in my opinion. We should be accepted as who we are – enabling us to express the balance that reflects our own true essence. How do we tackle this? Awareness as the starting point. Join us at #LeadershipChat and we’ll ask for more ideas!
Thanks so much for taking the time to comment – it means a lot to me.
Always provocative! I like to read posts that ask me to question my thinking. Great post lisa. What I take away from this is that any leadership stereotype is dangerous. Its not just those personality traits which are typically viewed as masculine vs feminine that are problematic. The stereotype could equally be applied to charismatic/extroverted leadership vs quieter/more analytical leadership. How many introverts feel overlooked when it comes to promotion to leadership roles? To fully leverage the value of different personality types, approaches and perspectives to avoid stagnation in the leadership pool, we must find ways to redefine leadership as more than a bundle of ‘typical’ traits to one more finely tuned to each situation and select/support as necessary
Thank you, Gaby and beautifully said! And yes, I feel the same way about introverts…my Introvert’s Guide to Business and Leadership touches on this quite a bit. All the best and hope to see you tonight on #LeadershipChat!
Hello Lisa, I sense this a hot-water post a lot of people don’t want to touch. What I will say is the “person” best qualified for the job/position/role should be the one who gets it, regardless of race, gender, etc.
I think another problem that can occur is over-compensation trying to correct past wrongs and this can be just as negative in impact.
To Gabriella’s point regarding introverts, that’s an issue I have with these personality assessments. True they may have a gauge on a ‘typical’ ideal candidate but that doesn’t mean its accurate. Every situation is different and so is everyone and how they react. A “leader” who is an extrovert may rub people the wrong way compared to a introverted person who is more reserved in their decision making. This could affect positive or negative how people respond to their leadership. I don’t think there is any one right answer, but too many people seem to think they know the wrong one.
Your thoughts?
Adam, Thanks as always for your insights. I agree – we should focus on providing the job to the person most qualified and actually most passionate about the role, regardless of race, gender or where they fall on the introversion-extroversion scale. Every situation is different, as you beautifully pointed out!
Lisa,
Wow, great thinking as always. I’m actually aware of a situation now in which a female is directing a male who could be considered her superior (I hate chain of command language but it works here).
I find it interesting because from what I know of the situation the male individual was not as receptive to direction from a male peer. There are two genders on the planet for reasons beyond breeding and I think more people need to see that.
While male/female work relationships can be complicated I also believe they can be highly productive and creative in nature.
Always love your writing Lisa, always.
Jim 🙂
Thanks, Jim – your support has always meant so much to me. It would be interesting to know more about the situation. I have to believe that there was something in that gentleman’s relationship with his male peer that was the root of the issue, rather than gender, but stereotypes and pressure to conform to certain roles can create a genuine leadership challenge between genders.
And I couldn’t agree with you more – our relationships can be so creative when we complement each other! Your chat and my Leadership Chat with Steve Woodruff I believe are two great examples! Thanks again, Jim!